Recently, I was speaking at an internal session on managing performance and explained why I believe the role of a leader is to help people be the best they can be.
The discussion began when we were asked to identify measures of staff satisfaction and organisational success. One of the first things that came up was staff retention with many believing this this is a sign of problems.
Now, I accept that if staff start leaving in numbers then it can indicate that there is a problem which needs to be addressed but I asked them to consider a different possibility: perhaps it shows that people are being managed well, developing skills and progressing to the next level.
When asked, I explained to the group that I strongly believe part of my responsibility as a leader is to develop people. This means that they should grow professionally during their time in a role, gaining new skills and enjoying a boost in confidence. Ideally, they would then rise through the ranks and feel the satisfaction and fulfilment of working for an organisation that nurtures talent, utilises this appropriately and rewards people for their success.
However, in a small organisation, it can be hard to do this and so it needs to be OK to develop people so that they can move on. If people move on to better things as a result of what they learnt with me, then I consider that a good outcome for the organisation. I also find that it means we have champions in the wider world and many of my staff are still working with us in their new roles.
Doing things in this way creates ambassadors who can raise awareness of our work with their new colleagues and partners.
The 80/20 rule
In terms of how I ensure people are able to develop, I believe in an 80/20 rule. Put simply, this means that individuals should spend 80% of their time doing things they feel they are good at and 20% stretching themselves.
To help me identify their strengths and development areas, I ask staff to complete a personal development plan which allows them to list their skills, achievements and goals. We then sit down and have a discussion about what they have included and I might make further suggestions about anything I think is missing. People don’t always see something as a strength or a talent so I might explore certain things with them to highlight any skills I think they have but don’t recognise.
This provides a framework for which they can develop an action plan to push themselves forwards.
The theory part
One of the key theories that underpins my leadership style is Dan Pink’s work on motivation which argues that the three things people need to be successful at work is autonomy, mastery and purpose.
The 80/20 rule means that they spend 80% of their time utilising their strengths and working towards mastery. If their time is spent mostly on things they enjoy and feel they are good at, then they will feel good most of the time and will be doing things that fire them up, satisfy them and allow them to feel confident.
From that place, they can focus on the other 20% which should be about things they either don’t want to do (we all have those things) and things that they want/need to learn to be the best they can be.
The key to success with the 20% is to have a clear action plan which identifies skills and competencies that need to be developed in order to achieve career goals. This should include steps that will be taken to ensure that individual can push forwards and make tangible progress towards their goals.
In terms of monitoring, I hold individuals to account for completing their actions by making sure progress is discussed on a quarterly basis and then on an annual basis, I ask staff to reflect again and complete a new plan for the year ahead.
If you look through the stages, you can see that the method is based on the high performance cycle – Plan, Do, Review and Improve. In following this process and ensuring the 80/20 ‘balance’, I believe people can be supported to achieve ‘flow’ which, in positive psychology, is:
This has to be the state of optimum performance and exactly where we surely would want our teams to be so I challenge you to try a different way and see the difference it makes.
If you can see the value of this approach or have similar methods yourself, share your thoughts in the comments below.